Entrepreneurship & Strategy

Pick Watermelons, Not Sesame Seeds: Yahoo and Apple

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Book excerpt (Wu Jun, tagged #吳軍見識; historical details are the source’s account and have not been independently verified)

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2024-10-22. Translated 2026-10-30 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Wu Jun’s article argues that focusing on picking up sesame seeds means forever losing the chance to pick watermelons. It uses Yahoo as an example: the article says it took only ten years to go from the world’s leading internet company to being sold. Besides encountering Google and Facebook, Yahoo hurt itself by collecting countless small product lines without a world-leading one. By contrast, Apple’s product lines could be counted on one hand, yet it was the world’s most profitable company. After returning to Apple, Jobs crossed out many small projects, kept only a single-digit number of products, and made each a watermelon. The article concludes that those pursuing watermelons must be able to tolerate solitude.

Key points

  • Pick watermelons rather than sesame seeds.
  • Yahoo had many products but no world-leading one, according to the article.
  • Apple had few product lines yet made the most money; Jobs sharply cut its portfolio on returning, the article says.
  • Be willing to endure solitude and develop the ability to pursue watermelons.
One clear path continues into the distance among several branching routes, suggesting choice and focus.
Entrepreneurship & strategyThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

Wu Jun: “Pick watermelons, not sesame seeds.” When someone devotes all their attention to picking up sesame seeds, they forever lose the possibility of picking watermelons. Yahoo, once a shining name in internet history, took only ten years to go from the world’s leading internet company to being sold. In the broader environment, it was unlucky to encounter stronger companies such as Google and Facebook. But its habit of picking sesame seeds in its product portfolio also hurt it. Yahoo developed countless internet services. Before using its products, users had to search for their web addresses. Yet among all those products, hardly any was number one in the world. Many product lines had very limited traffic and earning power, contributing only tiny sesame seeds. Even added together, they brought in less revenue than a single Google product. Every market has many companies like Yahoo. They see someone making money in a field and want to enter it too, only to end up with a sesame-seed-sized market share that is not worth the effort. Rather than doing this, they would be better off making the most of their own strengths. Apple’s product lines can be counted on one hand, yet it is the company that makes the most money in the world—because it is picking watermelons. People who pick watermelons think very differently from those who pick sesame seeds. They are not tempted by tiny gains; they take a longer view. When Jobs returned to Apple, he found a great many projects and products that were merely sesame seeds. He crossed them out one by one until only a single-digit number of products remained, then turned each into a watermelon. That was how he brought Apple back to life. There are many people picking sesame seeds in the world and few picking watermelons. If you dedicate yourself to watermelons, you must be able to tolerate solitude. Some people say, “But I have never come across a watermelon.” In reality, it is not that you have never encountered one. You see nothing but sesame seeds and spend every day gathering them, leaving no opportunity to develop the ability to pick watermelons. #吳軍見識 [Wu Jun’s Insights]

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →