English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2022-09-14. Translated 2026-10-24 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文
Reading guide
Robin offers five observations on institutional investors' time pressure. First, funds must dispose of holdings at maturity, so investors need growth to generate high returns quickly; founders may feel time differently. Second, institutional investors and unicorn startups generally want more than linear growth. Without exponential growth within a certain period, unicorn status is unlikely and returns may be limited. Third, do not rush to institutional investors while still refining the product or seeking product-market fit (PMF): they will often demand exponential growth and greater market spending instead. Fourth, time pressure is not necessarily bad. If you are building the next big thing, the opportunity window may be short, and investor capital can help establish your position before giants enter. Fifth, corporate venture capital (CVC) and evergreen funds have their own financial pressures. As the fourth point suggests, a time-constrained VC may actually be the better choice.
Full text — English translation
#DoNotBringInCapitalLightlyBeforeYouAreReady
Today, a point about time: running a company and deploying capital involve fundamentally different views of time.
Entrepreneurs can commit for the long term, even for the foreseeable future. Capital, however, has time limits. External capital at any particular stage is unlikely to stay with a founder forever; it will have a point when it must exit.
(I suspect the operating models of venture funds advertised as perpetual may ultimately depart from the essence of pursuing high growth, high returns, and high risk within a limited time.)
Because capital has time limits, it demands very high growth over a short period. Taking high risk and requiring high growth and high returns within a limited time is the essence of venture capital.
If your business model still needs validation, or your product or service still needs time for refinement and testing, think particularly carefully about whether this is the right time to bring in capital. Once capital arrives, it demands high growth; there is little time to wait while founders slowly refine their products and services.
If capital demands rapid growth while the founder has not figured out the direction and can only expand blindly to meet those demands, the result may well be disastrous.
---
Now it is time for a few thoughts from Robin:
1. Institutional investors face time pressure and must dispose of holdings when funds mature. This creates urgency: they need growth to generate high returns quickly. Founders themselves may not share that same sense of urgency.
2. Institutional investors and unicorn startups are usually not satisfied with linear growth. Without exponential growth within a certain period of the entrepreneurial journey, a startup is unlikely to become a unicorn. If it cannot become a company with enormous market value, the returns it can offer investors are usually relatively limited.
3. If your startup is still refining its product or seeking PMF, do not rush to institutional investors. After investing, they will often ask you to position for exponential growth and increase market spending, rather than continue refining the product and searching for PMF.
4. Institutional investors' strong time pressure is not necessarily bad. If what you are doing is important and could become the next big thing, the time available to your team is usually short and the opportunity window narrow. You must use investor capital to establish your market position quickly. If you are only at the same stage as the giants when they enter, there will usually be little room left for you.
5. Many teams want to avoid time pressure and seek CVC or evergreen funds. Remember that these investors also have their own financial pressures and considerations. And, as point four suggests, a time-constrained VC may actually be the better choice.
These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.
DISCUSSION
Reader comments
What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.
Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.
Comments load when you reach this section.
Administrator sign-in Sign out