Entrepreneurship & Strategy

Technical Barriers and Complete Solutions: Taiwan’s Software Companies Need Larger Global Markets

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s industry analysis (as of August 2023)

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2023-08-11. Translated 2026-11-04 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Robin discusses two challenges for Taiwan’s software industry. The first is technical barriers: in 2001, Openfind believed Chinese-language search offered a substantial barrier to competition, yet Google ultimately swept the global market. With zero marginal cost, software readily favors the biggest players. The second is complete solutions: large companies use acquisitions to assemble comprehensive offerings, making it hard for a small company’s superior standalone product to compete with an integrated suite. Robin argues that market scale matters most. Taiwan’s software industry once benefited from its position as a computer manufacturing powerhouse, with PC-cillin and CyberLink as examples. Its future requires reaching beyond Taiwan into large international markets.

Key points

  • Software’s zero marginal cost makes it easy for the biggest players to keep growing stronger.
  • Technical barriers are difficult to sustain, as illustrated by Openfind and Google.
  • Large companies acquire complete solutions, sparing customers the work of integrating separate products.
  • Taiwan’s software companies need to compete in larger international markets.
One clear path continues into the distance among several branching routes, suggesting choice and focus.
Entrepreneurship & strategyThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

The previous question was about market size. Market size often indicates the potential return. This question is about technical barriers in software and complete solutions. In 2001, Taiwan’s Openfind wanted to build the world’s largest Chinese-language search engine, also called Openfind—you can Google it. The National Taiwan University professor who founded the company confidently told investors that the Chinese-language barrier was extremely high. However strong Google’s technical capabilities might be, its search technology had been developed for English, and its Chinese search results were far inferior to Openfind’s. But we all know what happened next. In the face of technology, there was essentially no barrier, and before long we saw Google sweep across the world. Software may be eating the world, but it has another characteristic: zero marginal cost. That makes winner-take-all outcomes easy to produce. We do not see 1,000 search engines around the world; in the end, people use just one to three. The other issue is complete solutions. The previous post mentioned Tai Ruan (台軟) developing word-processing software. But Microsoft offered not only word processing, but spreadsheets and other office tools as well. It could give customers a complete office suite. Suppose some Taiwanese software products and solutions really are good. Another problem then arises: large companies often have complete solutions. Take France’s Dassault Systèmes. Through acquisition after acquisition, it has assembled a comprehensive range of solutions. When competing for enterprise customers, a small Taiwanese startup may have an exceptionally talented team, and its product A may score 15–20% better overall than the product of an Israeli startup acquired by the giant. Yet the giant has a complete set of solutions—A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and so on—with mutual support and full integration. Enterprise users do not have to buy A from one vendor, B from another, and then F from a third, only to find someone else to integrate A, B, and F. ----- In Robin’s view, market size is the most important consideration in software. Twenty to thirty years ago, Taiwan’s software industry depended on Taiwan’s position as a computer manufacturing powerhouse: 9.5 out of every 10 computers were made by Taiwanese manufacturers. Software was also bundled with each computer sold. That is how we came to see Taiwanese software successes such as PC-cillin, among the most successful and internationally established names today, and CyberLink. Fast-forward 30 years, and Taiwanese software companies have to find ways to reach beyond Taiwan and compete in large international markets, because software is another industry in which the biggest players tend to keep growing stronger.

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →