Capital Markets & Governance

Generosity in Sharing, Wisdom in Allocating: Rewards Are Not Incentives

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Reproduced column on equity incentives

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2021-10-15. Translated 2026-10-30 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Before discussing equity incentives, one distinction must be clear: incentives are primarily about encouraging future value creation, not recognizing past contributions. Recognition of past contributions is a reward; the two must not be confused. Many companies allocate shares by employees’ current tenure and positions, only to achieve the opposite of what they intended. Everyone feels they are the most capable person in the department, have contributed the most, or have served the longest. The allocation leaves everyone dissatisfied and unconvinced of others’ entitlement, intensifying internal conflict instead of motivating people. Worse, recipients may regard the shares as something they were owed all along: withholding them was a debt, so returning them deserves no thanks. For the founder, it becomes a double loss. Authority has been delegated, equity distributed, and benefits shared, yet the internal climate changes. Rules are the surface; human nature is the foundation. Using the logic of equity rewards to design equity incentives often marks the turning point toward a company’s decline. The right approach is a plan suited to the business’s own development, rather than a rigidly copied template. A mechanism focused on the future, shared benefits, and shared risks can unite founders, senior managers, and frontline employees in expanding the value of the business together.

Key points

  • Rewards recognize past contributions; incentives encourage future value creation.
  • Allocating shares by tenure and position can leave everyone feeling unfairly treated.
  • The attitude “I was entitled to this anyway” can leave founders worse off on both fronts.
  • Focus on the future, share the benefits, and share the risks.
Columns and beams in an open building are connected by central rods and balanced weights, suggesting structure and checks in governance.
Capital markets & governanceThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

Willingness to share takes generosity; knowing how to allocate takes wisdom. First, we must clarify an important concept: an “incentive.” The emphasis in equity incentives is on motivating people. Their primary criterion is future value creation, not past contributions. If something is based on past contributions, it is a “reward,” not an “incentive.” The two must not be confused. Many companies that have introduced equity incentives classify employees by criteria such as current tenure and position: how many years someone has worked in a particular role and how many shares that person should receive. What happens? Distributing the shares may backfire, because this allocation method can leave everyone feeling unfairly treated. Anyone who has worked in an organization will recognize the thoughts: “I am the most capable person in this department,” “I have contributed the most to the company,” “Nobody has been here longer than I have.” Everyone believes they have contributed the most. Allocate shares this way, and nobody is satisfied or accepts the others’ claims. Instead of motivating people, it can intensify conflict within the business. That is not the worst of it. Worse still, employees who receive equity may think, “These shares were mine by right. You owed them to me when you withheld them before. Now that you have returned them, I have no reason to thank you.” That is hardly a good sign. From the founder’s perspective, it is often a double loss. Authority has been delegated, equity distributed, and benefits shared. Surely that should motivate people? Yet the internal climate has changed. Rules are the surface; human nature is the foundation. Willingness to share takes generosity; knowing how to allocate takes wisdom. A mistaken starting point determines a mistaken outcome. When equity incentives are designed using the logic of equity rewards, the moment that thinking emerges is often the turning point toward the company’s decline. This distinction must take root in founders’ minds: rewards are not incentives. Rewards recognize past contributions; incentives encourage future value creation. Focus on the future, share the benefits, and share the risks. The best plan is the one that fits. Rigidly copying someone else’s template will not work. A company must design an equity-incentive plan suited to its own development, establishing a mechanism that looks to the future, shares benefits, and shares risks. Only then can it fully realize the potential of its key people and get founders, senior managers, and frontline employees working together to expand the business’s “pie.” Nobody wants their company to remain mediocre and stand still forever. You should still have a dream—what if it comes true?

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →