Venture Capital & Investing

Extraordinary Returns Come from Change; Risk Cannot Be Avoided

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s own quoted observation + book excerpt (Surviving a Startup)

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2021-09-18. Translated 2026-10-23 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Robin’s observation: extraordinary returns come from the exponential growth that a company’s changes create. An excerpt from Surviving a Startup distinguishes two kinds of risk: risk in established fields can be controlled, while risk in new fields is unavoidable. It includes the Nike founder’s cash-flow bets and Robin’s self-deprecating suggestion that one might be better off remaining an employee. Cautions: the claim that a bigger leap in innovation increases the probability of a greater return has not been independently verified; taking more risk is not necessarily better. The account of Nike winning every time carries survivorship bias and is not a basis for advocating an all-in bet.

Key points

  • Extraordinary returns come from the exponential growth created by change.
  • Risk in established fields can be controlled; risk in new fields is unavoidable.
  • Stories of successful bets are subject to survivorship bias.
  • Taking more risk is not necessarily better.
Trees at different stages of growth with connected roots on cream paper, suggesting patient cultivation and lasting value.
Venture capital & investmentThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

The bigger the leap in innovation, the greater the risk—but the probability of returns growing exponentially is greater as well. A startup with no risk is not worth investing in from a venture capital perspective. Robin: “What really delivers extraordinary returns for venture capital is that the companies we invest in create change. That change brings exponential growth, which in turn produces remarkable returns.” --- We all know that starting a business requires taking risks. But is taking enormous risks really wise? Should you not reduce risk, proceed cautiously, and stick to methods you know will work? That depends on what you want. For a slow-growing business in an established industry, controlling risk is a good strategy. But if you want to open up an entirely new field, surpass all your competitors, and experience rapid growth, risk is something you simply cannot avoid. You cannot eliminate all risk and still stand out in a winner-take-all market. Suppose you choose the least risky path and focus on an idea you know can succeed because you have seen someone else do it and make a good deal of money. That may reduce your risk, since you know the market exists, but it also limits your upside. If you cannot open up a new field, you cannot change your industry. If you cannot innovate beyond the successful examples that came before you, you cannot gain a truly meaningful competitive advantage. Innovation, by definition, means trying something nobody has done before. The bigger the leap in innovation, the greater the risk—but the probability of returns growing exponentially is greater as well. In other words, a startup with no risk is not worth investing in from a venture capital perspective. If the bet you make carries no risk at all and can still make a great deal of money, you can be sure everyone will rush in to see whether they can get a share. The market will become crowded very quickly, inevitably squeezing profit margins. Building a unicorn without taking any risk is therefore almost impossible. Truly great entrepreneurs keep doubling down on what they believe in. They cannot help taking one more step forward. In Nike’s early days, Phil Knight was almost constantly on the brink of bankruptcy. When Nike entered a period of explosive growth, he kept staking everything on the following month’s revenue. He did not know whether he would have enough money to pay his employees the next month, yet he won every time. That made Nike the world’s fastest-growing sporting goods company. If you are not someone who dares to take risks, and do not feel that urge deep down, perhaps you should consider being an employee like me, Robin. #穿越寒冬 #SurvivingAStartup

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →