Entrepreneurship & StrategyFeatured

Building at the Application Layer: A 60-Point Product Will Lose to the Giants

Share this article
LINEFacebook

Robin’s commentary (as of March 2023)

Storage information

Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.

Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above

English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2023-03-30. Translated 2026-11-05 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文

Reading guide

Robin argues that a startup building at the application layer—on a technology giant’s platform—may lack strong barriers and differentiation. A better way to win is exceptional product quality and user experience. A competent team can produce a 60-point product, but a giant can casually do the same; matching it means losing. Differences emerge between 60 and 80, while winning truly requires 90 to 100, with each additional half-point to point extremely difficult. Use your product and competitors’ products as a user would, examining differences throughout the workflow and whether they actually solve users’ problems.

Key points

  • Application-layer startups with weak barriers need to win through product and user experience.
  • A product scoring the same 60 points as a giant’s will lose.
  • Winning requires 90 to 100 points, and every additional point is difficult.
One clear path continues into the distance among several branching routes, suggesting choice and focus.
Entrepreneurship & strategyThematic illustration · AI generated

Full text — English translation

If your startup is at the application layer, you are building your solution on a technology giant’s platform. Your barriers and differentiation may not be strong enough. A better way to win is to take the product and user experience to an exceptional level. Use your product and competing products from the user’s perspective. Experience the differences across the entire workflow and whether the products solve users’ problems. Any reasonably competent team can create a 60-point product. But a giant can casually produce a 60-point product too. Giants are mostly platform operators and will not spend too much time polishing and optimizing an individual product’s experience. If yours scores the same 60 points, there is little more to say: you will be crushed immediately. From 60 to 80 points, differences among startups begin to show. Getting to 80 may not be too difficult for a good product team. But truly winning requires 90 to 100. Every additional half-point to point is extremely difficult and challenging. Only by perfecting the user experience and workflow do application-layer startups have a chance to win.

These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.

Share this article
LINEFacebook

DISCUSSION

Reader comments

What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.

Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.

0 / 2000

Comments load when you reach this section.

    Administrator sign-in

    My reading notes

    These notes stay in this browser and are not published. Writing a note also saves the article. Back up or move your notes in My Reading.

    Manage my bookmarks and notes →

    STAY CURIOUS

    Save a good question for your next visit.

    Save this article, or follow the Facebook page and RSS feed for additions. Historical articles retain their original publication dates.

    Browse All articlesSearch articles and full text →