Taiwan's Innovation Board versus Shanghai's STAR Market: A Hope for the Future
Storage information
Bookmarks and reading positions are stored in this browser. Manage and back them up in My Reading.
Collected in Robin Shen’s Field Notes · Content type and attribution are shown above
English translation of the Chinese post originally published 2022-12-30. Translated 2026-10-25 with AI assistance. Historical figures and claims have not been updated or independently verified. 中文原文
Reading guide
Robin compares the markets: the Shanghai Stock Exchange STAR Market listed its first 25 companies in July 2019 and reached 500 in just over three years, raising RMB759.4 billion through IPOs with a total market capitalization approaching RMB6 trillion. Taiwan's Taipei Exchange had 808 listed companies worth NT$4.428 trillion, making STAR about 5.8 times larger by market value. STAR attracts hard-tech companies and supports investment in early-stage, small, technology-focused businesses. Nearly 90% of its companies had private-equity or venture-capital backing before listing. Market capitalization plus revenue can qualify a company without profitability; investors need two years of experience and at least RMB500,000 in their securities accounts. Robin hopes that after three to five years of development, Taiwan's Innovation Board can reach one-tenth of STAR's scale and significantly advance innovation investment in Taiwan. Figures reflect year-end 2022.
Key points
- In just over three years, STAR reached 500 companies, RMB759.4 billion in IPO proceeds, and nearly RMB6 trillion in market value.
- Nearly 90% of STAR companies had private-equity or venture-capital backing before listing.
- Listing criteria can exclude profitability; investors face two-year experience and RMB500,000 thresholds.
- Robin hopes that reaching one-tenth of STAR's scale would significantly advance innovation investment in Taiwan.

Full text — English translation
These articles are personal notes, book excerpts, and collected reprints. Figures and events reflect the time of the original publication, are not current information, and do not constitute investment advice.
DISCUSSION
Reader comments
What did this article make you think about? Different perspectives and constructive criticism are welcome.
Comments are public immediately. Do not include personal contact details or external links. Automated checks block suspicious solicitation, prohibited transactions and spam; they can make mistakes.
Comments load when you reach this section.
Administrator sign-in Sign out